French publishers and authors require a goal for works protected by copyright used in training
Three French commercial groups have taken legal actions against the objective of the generalized use made by the copyright company protected to train its generative model of AI, all without authorization.
French editors and authors have declared him They will take the goal in courtaccusing the social network company of using its works without the permission to train Artificial intelligence model. Three commercial groups declared on Wednesday that they would take legal actions against a goal in a Paris court for what they considered the “Use of mass of the works Protected from copyright without authorization “by the company To train your generative the AI model.
The goal made available to users of his Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp platforms Chatbot participants based on the generativeAnd the National Editors Union, which represents the editors of books, indicated that numerous works of its members appeared in the finish line. Vincent Montagne, president of the National Union of Editors, He accused the goal of “violation of copyright and parasitism”.
Another group, the National Union of Authors and Composers, which represents 700 writers, playwrights and composers, said that the question was necessary to protect the members of “The IA that Bags your works and cultural heritage To train. “The union is also worried about the IA that” produces “fake books” that compete with real books “, said Francois Peyrony, president of the Union.
The third group involved in the question, the société des gens of Lettres, represents the authors. Everyone requires the “complete elimination” of the data directories created by Meta No authorization to train your model AI. By virtue of the large artificial intelligence law of the European Union, the generative systems of the AI must comply with the copyright law of the 27 countries of the blockade and be transparent on the material they use for training.
This is the last example of the clash between creative and editorial industries and technological companies around Data and copyright. Last month, more than 1,000 British musicians, among them Annie Lennox, Kate Bush and Damon Albarn- Have released a silent album To protest against the changes proposed by the government of the kingdom united to artificial intelligence laws, which artists fear to threaten their creative control.
The silent albumWhat’s the entitled ‘What do we want?’ (‘Is that what we want? The list of songs says it all: “The British government should not legalize the theft of music TO Benefit from the AI ”.
