In March, the European Commission presented the third edition of the Code of Conduct of AI for the General Use. The proposal aims to strengthen You have an act With new rules for the general use of artificial intelligence models, as well as for models of this type that have regular risks.
In the joint statement, the coalition states that one of the basic goals of the artificial intelligence law is to supply the authors, immediate translators and other rights -holders with the tools necessary to exercise their rights and enforce them.
Such as, The list requires the general use suppliers to implement measures to comply with the European Publishing RightsProvide detailed information about the content used to train your models.
However, the coalition argues that The third version of the Conduct Code It moves beyond the goal of protecting the creative sectors of the European Union. “It creates legal uncertainty, wrongly interprets European law on copyright and reduces the obligations specified under the AI law.”A group of interpreters, translators and rights holders says.
The coalition states that “instead of providing a strong image of compliance”, the latest version of the proposal “It defines a low standard that it does not provide any effective support to the authors, immediate translators and others’ holders to exercise their rights or enforce their rights.”Besides not to ensure that suppliers for public use are in line with the legislation of the author or artificial intelligence law.
Although it indicates that she participated in the process of clarifying the third edition of the Code of Conduct, the coalition argues in that.Code authors ignored or rejected these comments greatly..
“Unfortunately, the third edition does not fulfill the requirements of sufficiency provided by the European Union’s artificial intelligence law, and therefore, it should not be approved without significant improvements,” this alliance.
In the joint statement, the coalition states that the third issue “It reduces the commitment to ensure compliance with the rules of European publishing rights and the same artificial intelligence law.”.
The authors, translators, translators and rights holders claim that The project “Reduces the responsibility of suppliers” for public use Regarding measures to ensure that the data they use in their models do not violate copyright.
In addition, “the third edition continues to make the right to authors, immediate translators and other holders who use their rights, and do not provide clear guidance on how suppliers comply with these reserves.”
A a permit This confirms this The Conduct Code must provide concrete measures to ensure respect for the general use models of the basic principles of the author’s right And clarifying that the obligations of the artificial intelligence law apply whenever the resource places its model in the European market.
In Portugal, AudiOGEST (Rights Management and Distribution Association), Participant of the International Federation for Voice Industry (IFPI), which is part of the alliance, He also expresses his opposition to the third version of the Code of Conduct.
“The European Union has been created artificial intelligence to achieve a balance between technological innovation while protecting the rights of creators,” he says. Miguel Carits, General Manager of AidaAdapted in a statement.
However, the official argues that “This code of the rules of behavior undermines these principles and can pave the way for the improper use of protected content, without an effective mechanism for gravity by those with rights.”.
“It is fair to emphasize this Successive national governments interfere in European institutions, and seek to achieve an organization that balances the interests of creative industries and citizensMiguel Carridas adds today a policy of the Portuguese state itself.
