Decisions outside the scope of the judiciary in health law: á. Iruita

álvaro Iurita It has become part of the networks (external decisions in health law) –It was created for the promise and Lorenzo Abu Gharados– how Company manager. Since its new responsibility, it will be responsible for enhancing the growth, innovation and improvement of the company’s operations, as well as enhancing the organizational structure, enhancing operational efficiency and uniting the company as a reference in its sector.

Irurita holds a certificate in law from the Independent University of Madrid He has a strong profession in the health sector, specializing in major fields such as legal advice, human resources and risk management. During the past thirty years, he played The maximum roles of responsibility in HM hospitalsOne of the hospital’s reference groups in Spain, as director of the legal and human resources area.

A new stage in networks

With the entry of organic law 1/2025 of procedural efficiency on April 3, networks begin A new stage with the introduction of new tools And resources with a goal Consolidating as a reference to resolving disputes outside the scope of the judiciary In the health sector. This regulation provides a commitment to resorting to the appropriate means to resolve the conflict (MACC) before the courts attend the civil and commercial issues, thus enhancing negotiation as a procedural condition.

In conflict management, you must call for it Enhancing communication, information and active listeningAnd secret, intimacy and prevention. However, information is not provided to the patient at times, for fear of conflict and the judicial character of this. According to Varo Eurita, network manager, “Learn about errorsI apologize for conflicting care, creating and reviewing protocols to prevent such errors again and providing compensation solution at the procedure are behaviors not only enhances the patient’s medical relationship, but also involves saving emotional and economic costs to the parties. Therefore, at this new stage, we agree with the new regulations that force Masc to the resort before the start of judicial operations, because the assumption of these methods not only reduces the judicial burden, but also provides efficiency in resolving disputes. “

Experience and leadership in resolving conflict

With more than 5 years of experience in resolving conflict in the health sector, Networks have planted success models Whether in private companies or in the public field.

The team consists of expert lawyers in Health LawSpecialized medical experts, brokers and experts in MASC. The network manager also explained, “We have a specialized training in the Health and Mediation Law and the opinion of the medical experts taught by Lorenzo lawyers, the reference office regarding health responsibility for health care, promise, The first cabinet in medical offers in Spain. This entity was born from the agreement signed between both institutions to provide an effective and specialized solution in resolving conflict in the health sector. “

Innovation and digitization in Masc

In response to this new regulation, Networks expand your service portfolio with the main tools to facilitate the development of MasC. Thus, for example, a pre -MAC report, which seeks to facilitate customers, was launched to determine the most appropriate way to face and solve differences. This report determines the claim classification, evaluates or not professional responsibility, analyzes the applicable health regulations and determines the controversial amount.

Likewise, the opinion of an independent expert (Opei), which allows the parties to reach an agreement through a neutral technical evaluation, although it cannot be binding, could be a reference in subsequent negotiations or in judicial procedures. On the other hand, among the services they provide for the special success, as the neutral conciliator encourages dialogue between the two parties, providing them with advice and proposing solutions to achieve satisfactory agreements. Depending on the goal of the claim, success can be led by an expert lawyer in health law or by a specialized medical expert. In the same manner, there is legal assistance and experts in the processes of cooperative law, where cooperation and negotiations are promoted between the two parties to reach useful agreements. There is no need to resort to the courts and comprehensive support is provided to the parties.

Health mediation is also another aspect that is taken. In fact, an organized space is provided for dialogue where the expert broker facilitates communication and enhances consensual solutions, maintains trade or personal relations between the two parties and avoids escalation of conflict. In this line, there is also the personality of the defender of the believer, responsible for attending and resolving complaints and demands of users of insurance companies, and managing them with neutrality and transparency. “In addition, we continue to provide our services for health negotiation, ensuring that the parties are compatible with this mandatory step before the judicial path. In this way we want to put ourselves as a more effective alternative to resolving health conflicts, compliance with current regulations and provide high -quality service,” said Alparo Araretta.

As part of your vision for the future, The networks will implement a TELEMATICS processor for MASCFacilitate access to your customers. In addition, the entity will integrate artificial intelligence and automation to improve the allocation of cases, as well as a digital signature and electronic documents that will ensure the health and safety of the agreements reached.

Less and more agreements

With the implementation of organic law 1/2025 of procedural efficiency, a A noticeable decrease in litigation in courtAllow matters that really require a judicial intervention to solve more quickly. To resolve most differences, the parties will be able to reach the Mascs, with terms limited to three months, which will encourage the agreements faster, and avoid prolonging the courts with a decrease in the expenses associated with litigation, because these are usually cheaper than judicial operations.

In addition, in certain circumstances, the parties will be able to avoid condemnation of the coasts if they resort to MACC before the claim, and on the other hand, their use allows the IRPF exemption in the agreed compensation in an incomplete manner with a neutral third party intervention, which encourages the friendly exception to the additions. “We want to join the spirit of al -Qaeda and encourage changing the mentality towards the culture of friendly decision, giving the human nature to the controversy and enhancing peaceful and cooperative solutions before reaching the courts. To facilitate the transition to the new model, we offer many solutions that were adapted to the needs of both individuals and companies,” said Irurita.