Dictatorship and health care on the basis of evidence: basic incompatibility opinion
The articles of the Brazilian general team are written in the Portuguese linguistic alternative used in Brazil.
Free arrival: submitting the Public application Brazil in Android or IOS.
Republican governments often collide with the basic principles of science and seek to achieve objective truth. This dissonance is not just a theory, but it is deeply rooted in the structures of the power that constitutes our societies. Authoritarian governments need to control social accounts, a situation that directly contradicts the scientific method that enhances the investigation of the hypotheses and open discussion.
As Karl Popper, the philosopher, noticed the truth from the strong debate and the synthesis of different ideas, a process that challenges political interests. This freedom of thought is seen as a threat by authoritarian governments, which depend on absolute control over general information.
Universities, such as academic excellence and independent research centers, are often seen as a threat to authoritarian governments. Eliminating these institutions and reducing the value of reducing the value of their contraction to restrict their strength and critical resistance.
For those who are committed to the integrity of health care based on the best possible evidence, support for authoritarian regulations is incompatible. The last example of Brazil and the ongoing events in the United States clarifies how strong political manipulation of public health can undermine confidence in science and assign public health.
Recently, Portugal celebrated April 25, a teacher from the end of Salazar’s dictatorship. This date shows that it is necessary to reflect these lessons from the past. We must reaffirm our commitment to academic and scientific freedom, and protect them from any form of tyranny. In a world where the truth is often politicized, science remains a reliable compass, and we are directed towards a safer and healthy future.
