Archive a picture of a meeting in the field of negotiation.
he Ministry of Health The unions face a new day to negotiate to reform Marco Basic SystemJust two days before the great A manifestation of the medical group to demand a basic system. One of the claims, CesmA representative in the same The scope of negotiation Within FSES, but the fact is that in practice it does not have pillars inside the table. The majority of the Federation’s legitimate forces to negotiate with health are that the specifics of the medical profession have a place in a joint law that leaves no health category. Any other option, they point out that “the fragment of the system”. Just union, CsifIt opens a small door for Carta Magna optional, as long as working conditions are improved for all public health specialists.
“We do not exclude a specific law for doctors or together. What we want is specializations about content on classification, reward, today, guards, incompatibility and retirement. This is important. If it should be in A specific case for doctorsWhatever, “summarizes Medical writing Head of the National Health Sector in CSIF, Fernando Huntangas. For the responsible union, either in coordination, already in another, “it has not yet guaranteed the needs of the decent conditions of doctors or any other category.”
CCOO and UGT, in favor of one SNS law
in CCOO Yes, it is sharp in their rejection of the optional statute: “We consider that it is a special and exclusive law for doctors of the national health system (SNS) It is not the most appropriate option. “The Head of Public Policy and Employment and Intesa for the Union of Health and Social Sectors, Jesso JordanAnd it confirms that his training defends “equal conditions for all health professionals, regardless of its class.”
“The special statute can generate inequality and discrimination against other groups. We defend the SNS model depends on teamwork and cooperation among all Healthy professionals. The separate statute of doctors would get the regime to block this basic coordination and restrict the ability of collective negotiation because it will generate possible conflicts and imbalances in the sector.
Jordán is “essentially” recognition and improving the working conditions of doctors “ensuring the quality of health care”, but it defends that these characteristics have a place in a common base “stating all SNS employees:” a A unique law for all health professionals “You have the ability to improve the quality and security of health users,” he says.
In the same way, but in short, sources Public Services UGT They move to this method that the formation “has always called for the statute that is heading to all groups.”
CIG-SAúDE: “There is no medical consensus for the special statute”
They do not participate in Sad SadThe last unions represented in the field of negotiation, the idea of strengthening the medical statute. Moreover, its general secretary, Manuel GonzalezAnd he confirms that there is no consensus in this regard between the optional professionals: “Not all medical sectors agree In having your statute. “I am a doctor myself and I do not agree,” he says to this newspaper.
In this line, he says he does not understand that the claim of the optional statute is now arising, when the current is Marco Basic System It has been in effect since 2003: “Over time, it was necessary that it was necessary to modify it, but during these twenty years, we have not heard anyone in the medical sector criticizing it.”
Although she realizes that there are aspects of repression 24 hours guards and Rewards associated with a new professional classification “They should discuss”, for Cig-SAGDE “There is nothing related to the rights of doctors or any other health category that cannot be collected in a framework law for all.”
The information published in the medical writing contains data, data and data from official institutions and health professionals. However, given any questions related to your health, consult the opposite health specialist.
