Lebanon confirms to Ortus, his adherence to the disarmament of Hezbollah, Hezbollah
Lebanon is awaiting what the representative of the United States special correspondent for the Middle East, Morgan Ortotus, who returns from Tel Aviv, will carry on its president of the presidents: the Republic Joseph Aoun, the Parliament Nabih Berri and the Nawaf Salam government; To Ensure that are ready to Abandon Their Proposals to form diplomatic Working Groups to Launch Lebanese Prisoners in Israel, Withdraw from the Points that iron still keep, demarcate the Border Beteween the Two Countries, and prepare Timetable for the disarmment of Hezbollah, in Exchange in Exchange in Exchange. For Its Willingnss to Respond to the Unified Position of the Lebanese State Staff by Inviting Them to Stop The Israeli Violations, The Withdrawal of Israel, and the Release of the prisoners; In preparation to stabilize international borders between the two countries.
In anticipation of his meetings during his second visit to Beirut, it is necessary to ask you if he adheres to what he had previously presented, that he was closer to the threat, to exchange opinions, and there is no choice in front of Lebanon if not to adhere and remove the police policemen for the hands of the mandate for the hands in order to take his hands in the hands of the hands of the manuals. extend its sovereignty over all its lands, with a difference. It allows them to develop a defensive strategy to accommodate the “party” weapon, which has not returned as an entrance, in addition to the reforms to advance the crises and obtain Arab and international assistance to reconstruct the South, above all because its removal is an international Lebanese question.
“Naqza Lebanese” of the proposals
In Other Words, The Lebanese “Naqzah” of Its Proposals Remains An Existing Unless It Takes The Point of View of the Three Presidents Who Read in One Book To Answer Its Proposals On the Basis of Their Refusal to Normalize AS A Condition For The Withdrawal of Israel and the Application of Resolution 1701, and they suggest replacing it by follow the diplomatic means to conform the Borders Beteween the Two country, according to what was stipulated in the Armistice agreement, taking into account the road map. Which followed the demarcation of the maritime borders between the two countries and on the basis of what had been stipulated in the agreement sponsored by Paris and Washington, which Lebanon asks to fulfill its commitment to implement it.
In this context, the source confirmed that the Lebanese position will be present at the Table of negotiations with Ortigos. He told Al -Sharq al -awsat who are preparing in their position on the obligation of Israel to implement what was stipulated in the agreement according to which Lebanon was unilaterally stipulated. He stressed that Lebanon remains for its commitment to international decisions, the first of which is the application of 1701 in its degrees. He added that what was stipulated in the agreement, with the exception of setting the boundaries between the two countries, does not need to train diplomatic working groups, but rather a political decision made by Israel.
He believed that Lebanon did not escape the inventory of weapons in the hands of legitimacy, in accordance with what Aoun committed himself in the speech of the department with the monopoly of the State, which withdrew the ministerial declaration of the government of peace. He said that the “Shiite duo”, in particular “Hezbollah”, cannot evade the unilateral weapon in the hands of the state; Participate in the government by means, and it was a self -confidence.
“Hezbollah” and the transformations of the region
The source stressed that the party is not able to escape the transformations to which the Region and Lebanon has witnessed, and has been forced to adapt to it, and is leading a critical revision of its chain of transmission of Gaza, but needs some time to accrue the favorable conditions that allow him to engage in the new political phase under the title of impossibility of coexistence of two weapons.
He said that the dialogue remains the only corridor to limit weapons in the hands of the state, reaching the formulation of a defensive strategy for Lebanon. He underlined that there is the need to start it, provided that a period of time is determined to be approved so that the fate of dialogue is not like its predecessors, which has not allowed the application of what has been agreed.
Hezbollah is currently going through, according to the source, with a transition phase that requires it to adapt to the transformations to which Lebanon has witnessed; Because he needs a time that allows him and his fans to digest a politician who turned to the state project, which contradicts his weapon, and this requires that his leadership admit that what was allowed before his chain of transmission of Gaza is no longer acceptable after today.
Permanent period
The source stressed that there is no room for the withdrawal of the “party” weapon with the strength to avoid a sectarian division into Lebanon which is indispensable, and has seen that Washington must give the country a period of grace, in the political concept of the word, on condition that it is not long, and a sentence leads to the inventory of the arms in the hands of legitimacy without any partner; Because only keeping it blocked without a solution, it means that there is no room to save Lebanon and grab it from the bottom of the collapse.
The source asked: is there a problem with Washington, as long as you want to settle in Lebanon, to give the opportunity to start a dialogue that leads to the development of the defensive strategy on the application of the application, in accordance with what President Aou has promised in the Department’s speech? He believed that he should respond to the refusal of Lebanon of the principle of normalizing his relationships with Israel to avoid his insertion in an internal division, although there is no one who promotes him. Patriarch Maronito Bishara al -ra said conclusively that it was not yet time.
Ortigos will respond to the social security that will be the subject of discussion between her and the three presidents, in particular as regards the “party” weapon, which is limited to the ceasefire and argues from responding to Israeli violations, which allows the medium to hand at hand, which allows you to devote itself to a violation of Lebano due to an interval due to an interval due to a interval due to a interval due to a interval Interval due to a cash interval for its interior front of difficult options, the best of which is, due to its effects and divisions that do not serve the conservation of stability in the country.
