“The firmness” of Israel without American support “in doubt” … and the Iran war requires “huge resources”

Mirare to the aim of Ben Guruion airport did not on the threats, but he said. Two months ago, the head of the army staff, Eyal Zamir, had put his hand on his position “in 2025 as a date for a possible military confrontation with Iran”, and two days later, the Israeli forces participated in the joint training with American and British planes, with the participation of the strategic B52 bomber in the heaven of the Middle East.

The fact that preparing for a war with Iran is rooted in the depth of military establishment. In a report by “Channel 13” of Israeli television, 7 former Air Force leaders have spoken of “preparations they have done since the middle of the last decade and are still ongoing, on a direct war with Iran”.

But the new is the high voices that speak of Israel’s ability to fight this war alone and to encourage Netanyahu to make his decision “immediately”, before Washington signed a nuclear agreement with Tehran.

The owners of these rumors say that the President of the United States Donald Trump, although “Israel’s best friend among the leaders of the United States”, but works according to the principle of “America First”, and concludes an agreement to cancel the Iranian military nuclear project and maintain civil nuclear nuclear power centuries.

The profound concern in Israel is also focused on “neglecting the dossier of the ballistic missiles produced by Iran and threatens Israel”, which is anxious to push the former Israeli ambassador to Washington, Mike Orn, to encourage Netanyahu to “work alone and not rely on Trump”.

“My existential risk”

The Israeli elite does not consider Iran as an immediate threat. “It is an existential threat to the state of Israel”.

Klotstein believes that “Israel’s session is inactive for fear of a regional war that improves the self -awareness of the Iranians, and accelerates their haste towards the nuclear bomb”, whose goal seems to be “a way to combat the West and this guarantees the destruction of the state of the Jews and its eradication from the map”.

In an article that wrote on the “Destro -Wing” website in which he works and directed himself from Moir Bin Shabat, who is close to Netanyahu, he believes that “making a decision to attack Iran is not easy, since he needs enormous resources and enormous preparations, and places a huge logistics challenge and a great diplomatic diplomacy and this involves the life of many.”

Klhestein asked Israel’s leadership: “who already sees the imminent danger”, saying: “If you don’t do anything today, then when?”

The opponents say that the enthusiastic movement of hitting Iran “has a very short memory” given what happened after the Hamas attack on October 7, 2025, when Netanyahu rushed to the former president of the United States Joe Biden to seek help, and in reality Washington moved an aerial bridge and the equipment to Tel Aviv.

Explicit resolutions

The Vitali Institute for Foreign Policy in Tel Aviv, at the end of last month, conducted a research in depth, with the participation of military, political and strategic experts, and have come out with the conclusion that “Israel can defend themselves, but also in this it needs the United States, therefore what to say of a war that Israel launches on Iran”.

“The recently growing hadiths on the Iranian attack and on nuclear structures with independent Israeli strikes, a sort of dangerous disinformation,” said Aran Etzio, the former deputy head of the National Security Council in the Israeli government and the former head of the political planning department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Etzio, who participated in the research, confirms that these threats “not only come from the political movement to power in Israel, but also from the United States”.

Etzion reported a message published by American average months ago, and was with the signature of 77 generals and a retired American admiral, in which they are embracing Trump to support any possible Israeli military action against Iran, warning that Tehran is close to the production of nuclear weapons.

It was stated in the letter, which discovered that the “Jewish Institute for American National Security” was the one who organized it, that “the time has come to allow Israel to end the work against the Iranian axis and to prevent Iran from getting around the nuclear threshold”, while soliciting Washington to provide the necessary military support.

The signatories added: “The nuclear Iran will constitute a direct threat to the national security of the United States. What Israel requires is the support that guarantees the maximum effectiveness of its operations, managing the risks of the Iranian response. We must move quickly, especially in light of the increase in Iranian enrichment operations and their interference in the work of the IEEA inspectors.

The “whip”, which threaten Tehran

Israeli research institutes, who are studies on the Iranian threat, say that the discussion on the question of hitting Iran has existed for many years, when the nuclear project has been revealed. Israel was constantly controversial with western countries, who prefer the language of dialogue and diplomacy. At the time, I accepted the role of the “whip” that threaten Tehran.

But something has changed in this. At the time, it was clear that Israel could not only hit the Iranian nuclear project, just like in an impressive in 1981 when the Iraqi nuclear reactor destroyed and in 2007 when the Syrian nuclear reactor destroyed.

Therefore, Iran learned the lesson and established 21 structures distributed on all parts of the country and has put most of them underground and in the depths of the mountains, the last of which is a reactor near the net with a depth of 100 meters underground.

On the other hand, Israel “does not have the skills of most of these structures”, according to the estimates of the Israeli Institute “Misagaf”, which says: “Washington also does not have it”. He concludes that “any blow for Iran will not eliminate the nuclear project and, in the best cases, will shrink and delay it two or three years”.

Paralyzed the Iran economy with a blow

Another idea, the head of the Israeli opposition, Yair Labid, is to hit the economic structures in Iran. He says that “the prejudice for the economy and the feeling that Israel is able to hit Iran and carry out various operations within it, destroys the prestige of the regime and accelerates the internal struggle to overturn it”.

However, after violating Hezbollah, Hamas and even Iran, and after the collapse of the Bashar al -assad regime in Syria, the circle of the Israeli movement, which requires military blows to Iran, as supporters of this trend see that “Israel has shown great skills to bomb Iran and was able to cut the weapons (Revolutions in the Region.”

“Israel can now carry out her operations with greater freedom and it will be more difficult for Tehran to face it,” says Lubid.

“So that the train doesn’t miss you”

However, the researcher Etzion warns of these concepts, because “Israel seriously suffers from the collapse of the strategic belief and in the absence of strategic reports”.

“The ministers of the war in the cabinet are scarce and a section of them behaves in a childish, running towards the media to show their heroism and do not maintain the secret and do not enjoy the minimum ability to face the challenges, and therefore Israel needs another leadership in which there is a majority of independent leaders.”

Etzion believes that the National Security Council in Israel, which was once a strong weight, is today a tool in the hands of the Prime Minister and is subject to its partisan reports and that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which was respected, lives today in a state of mobilization and has no role.

The summary of the “Mittfim” Institute is that what Israel should do now is that “does not allow the train to lose” and to ask Trump to occupy a chair on The negotiating table with IranAs struck by the attacks, it has been exposed to Iran’s weapons and therefore its interests can be taken into consideration.