The judge refuses the request of Christian lawyers and gives green light to the nobility of Noelia | Society
The judge of Barcelona who has maintained Paralyzed euthanasia in Noelia C.A 24 year old paraplegic girl suffering “A serious dependence, pain and chronic and impossible suffering”He finally rejected the application submitted by Christian lawyers on behalf of his father, who approved the decision of the Generaltat of Catalonia. The judge believes that the requirements established in the law on euthanasia and rejected the father’s request to revoke the decision of the Guarantee and Evaluation Commission of Catalonia (CGAC, the independent body that observes the correct application of the law), which in July 2024 gave the green light to Noelia. Furthermore, against the criteria of the prosecutor, the judge considers that the father is not entitled to present the complaint.
The sentence issued by the judge of the controversial-administrative is not the final point, since the Christian lawyers have already announced that, in the event of a defeat, the case would resort to the Superior Court of Justice of Catalonia (TSJC). The decision, however, closes at the time of the door, the claim of this Catholic entity to discuss, in court, the application of the law on euthanasia, approved by the government in 2021
In the first trial on the topic held in Spain, on March 4, Noelia ratified her detention desire to die. Second, seven doctors and experts who intervened in the process ratified their conclusions and said it The girl is completely trained to request euthanasia. After an attempt at suicide in October 2022, the young woman was prostrated in a wheelchair and, according to the conclusions of the CGAC, presented “a clinical situation not revealed” which produced “a serious dependence, chronic and impossible pain and suffering” with an impact on her autonomy and their daily activities. This is one of the cases provided by law.
After the sight, The prosecutor’s office was in favor of Noelia who received euthanasia Since he had decided “stopped, free and autonomous”. The public ministry considered, against the criteria of the Generalitat (who defends the CGAC’s decision), that The father had a legitimate interest in the cause. The judge concluded, however, that there is no legitimate interest and inadequate the case, therefore the resolution issued in his time by the general control agency.
