STF refuses from 9 to 1 Bolsonaro’s request to hinder Dino and Mauric; Zanin was released

The plenary session Federal Supreme Court ((STF) The resources of former President Gere Bolsonaro and General Braga Nito, who asked for the obstacle of the ministers Alexander de Morais, Valvio Dino and Cristiano Zanin To dispose of the trial on deceptive actions. The defendants’ defenses also called for the analysis of the operation by the supreme plenary session, not through the first degree.

The trial takes place in the virtual plenary session of the Supreme Court, and began on Wednesday. Most of the ministers follow a major vote STFand Luis Roberto BarrosoThat voted to deny requests. He was the only minister to vote in favor of Maurice and Dino Andre Mendona – who voted against Zanin’s request for removal.

The appeal ruling will occur before the evaluation of a PGR receipt or a complaint, which is scheduled to happen next week in the first place of the Supreme Court. Lawyers of the former president asked Zanin and Dino a disability by saying that they had filed a lawsuit against the former president in the past. The request was rejected by Barroso last month.

Bolsonaro’s defense, however, resumed. The same thing happened with Mario Fernandez’s requests and Berja Nito. Therefore, the case was analyzed by all ministers STF.

Friday, the public prosecutor of the Republic, Paulo GunnettHe defended the rejection of resources. For Gonet, the lawyers only reiterated “the reasons for pre -formulated claims” and that “the realistic and legal situation” that prompted Barroso to reject the original requests is equal.

On Thursday, Nunes Marques, President of the Supreme Court, Roberto Barrroso, and made a separate vote – the first so far does so, because it is only possible to follow the course position.

In his vote, the minister states that both Dino Wazanin will not have “any interest of an external nature” with regard to Bolsonaro and a possible favorable result for him. The defense of the former president claimed that the judges could not judge the former president because they have already submitted procedures against him in the past.

Nones Marquis wrote: “There is no possibility that the aforementioned judge has any interest of an external nature in the face of the descendants as a result of any favorable result of criminal procedures.”

In the vote, Mandmonda indicated as a cause of obstacles about the fact that Morais was a “victim of investigation facts” and a criminal action against Bolsonaro, which was lifted by Dino. Indeed, to vote against the removal of Zanin, Mindla argued that he did not see the performance of his colleague as a lawyer as a reason for the obstacle.

By voting to remove DinoOur delegate said that “he does not consider” that “the judge himself, who is in the same circumstances in fact, has realized the breaking of his neutrality in relation to all the operations of the civil nature in which certain individual numbers are as part, yet it can continue to judge it in a process of a criminal nature.”

It is already finished MoraMindkone says he sees “the loss of the judge’s neutrality in the case of criminal action, which includes a plan for his arrest and death.” In December 2024, by judging another request made by Bolsonaro’s defense, the minister had already assumed the same position.

Source link