Rubine Leal regrets the TC position in the Compassionate Murder Law and not expanding the RAM Funchal News Madeira News – Information from everyone for everyone!
Today, the President of the Regional Parliament, Robina Lille, commented on the publication of the ruling of the Constitutional Court, which decides that not to hear the independent region does not violate the constitution on the law of essential killing.
Parliament Speaker Madirin, Robina Lille, “regrets the argument line, followed by TC, which is a restriction of regional autonomy, and the issue is similar to the ceremony previously by that court, as happened in the procedures related to its freezing (volunteer load intersection (No. 75/2010), and more automatically, to the application admission 524/2023).
This understanding, by the Constitutional Court, is evidence, according to Robina Lille, the urgent need to proceed with a constitutional review, as well as the administrative political statute of the independent Madeira region, so that the right to hear regional parliaments in materials with a specific interest of both Madeira and Al -Azur.
In response to the regional character of the Madeira Health Service, the ALRAM president considers that in this particular case, Law No. 22/2023, the age of 25, but also in similar diplomas, to fulfill the constitutional principle of respecting regional independence independence, to fill it.
Since it was not heard during the legislative process that led to the approval of Law No. 22/2023 on May 25, which regulates the conditions according to which the deaths are not punishable by medically assistants, known as the Entrepreneial Killing Law, the Legislative Assembly in Madeira was announced, through its presidency, in May 2023, that lack of chaos and lining, for wheat. Additional policy, from many of its rules.
However, TC judges, through Judgment No. 306/2025, decided not to be constitutional or legally implemented that independent areas have heard during this legislative process, because they understand that the rules subject to supervision do not apply to the issues they respect specifically.
