In support of the WAQF law, 7 states have adopted the attitude of the Supreme Court, know what has said in your arguments – seven states of the WAQF law at the Supreme Court; What are their arguments

WAQF act at the Supreme Court On the one hand, while the period of policy and demonstrations takes place concerning the law on the modification of the WAQF, seven states moved the Supreme Court the supporter. Several petitions have been deposited by many political parties and Muslim organizations contesting the law on the modification of the WAQF at the Supreme Court. At the same time, seven states approached the Supreme Court to support this law and asked to intervene in the case and to keep their arguments before the court. These states argue that the law introduces significant reforms in order to improve the management and regulation of WAQF properties, increasing transparency and better governance.

Statement of arguments

Madhya Pradesh: The State government argued that the constitutional objections raised in this case are linked to discriminatory behavior, to arbitrariness and have no base, they should be rejected early. In addition, he declared that this law will provide an adequate improvement in the management and regulations of WAQF properties by increasing the system of transparency, responsibility and governance.

Chhattisgarh: According to the argument of Chhattisgarh, the aim of this law is to make the board of directors of the WAQF more inclusive, in particular by representing various Muslim sects for a better regime and WAQF administration. The state claims that the WAQF law creates a transparent and responsible system for the WAQF administration and aims to make a transformer change in the management of WAQF properties.

Assam: The state government has declared that the newly added 3rd section prohibits the declaration of all terrain in the planned or tribal areas (fifth calendar or sixth calendar). Assam has eight on a total of 35 administrative districts within the framework of the sixth appendix to the Constitution.

Rajasthan: The government said that it was not only constitutionally strong and not discriminatory, but that it is also based on the values ​​of transparency, equity and responsibility, and protects public interests, including religious arrangements. Rajasthan’s petition stipulates that this law does not deal with any religious group or discrimination. This only determines an appropriate legal framework to prevent illegal complaints.

Apart from that, the Maharashtra, Haryana and Uttarakhand also made a request indicating that the Act respecting the modification has envisaged a rationalized, technical and legally strong structure to manage WAQF assets. At the same time, socio-economic development has been promoted to beneficiaries.

The latest news from the country and the world (No news) Find out more in Hindi, all the big news Times Now Navbharat live TV But. Country (India News) Updates and elections (Elections) Times now Navbharat were associated with the latest news.