News

The High Court of the Punjab has reprimanded the government to the pension plan, said – the delay should be done financially – Punjab pension Scheme Done Court Raps Bhagwant Mann Govt NTC

The Supreme Court criticized the Punjab government for the late in the 1996 private regime, managed by Punjab, the college’s benefits regime and helped by the government. A bench led by judge Abhay Oka said: “The courts are taken lightly.” The court says that if the state does not act soon, it can be sentenced to financial benefits to the petitioners.

The chief secretary of Punjab, Kap. During the last hearing, Sinha received an outrageous notice. The court has repressed a reduction in compliance with policies, despite repeated insurance in the government of the State. The court said: “The insurance granted to the court have no meaning? The court said that if the government of the State had not taken rapid measures, they will have to compensate the petitioners for appropriate economic advantages.”

Read also: Police assault with army colonel in Punjab, wife accused of having cheated

The court gives time to the government of the state

The court has decided to give a little time to the government of the State for a solution. In addition, the court warned that if the solution is not found, the court will order the financial payment. The court declared to the State Council: “Express our feelings. If people in power can understand, give them time to understand.”

The next hearing on the case will be held on April 4

The court planned the next hearing of the case on April 4. Earlier, the court mentioned the High Court ordinance in 2002, in which the additional defender general of Punjab assured to publish and implement the regime, but now the government of the State cannot blame the executive of its failure.

Read also: “Women, Divyang and the elderly … 400 farmers will be published today”, Punjab IG has given information

He was asked of the chief secretary if the State would give compensation to the petitioners or if the court had to initiate an outrage procedure, but if it is not satisfied with the response, the state defender general appealed to the court to give a little time and assured that he would bring positive solutions.

Source link

Related Articles

Back to top button