The proposed agreement is American and Israeli in Gaza … A lasting solution or a return …
Amman – The sons of the crisis in Gaza are linked between the indicators of an imminent diplomatic solution and political maneuvers that hold the scene.
On the one hand, the movements of the American administration indicate an almost cease-fire statement, which President Trump can announce in order to contain climbing, but this step does not become isolated from the manipulation of the terms of “the peace agreement”, where the “Witakouf” initiative is reformulated several times by modified copies which empty its content.
In a parallel line, the articles of the Israeli political game reveal by the decision to prevent the Arab foreign ministers, including the Minister of Foreign Affairs Ayman Al -Safadi, to enter Ramallah, who disrupts any effort to relaunch the solution to two states and shows the depth of right penetration of the political decision.
These developments are not separated from the hidden conflict within the Zionist entity, because Netanyahu converts war into a pressure card to serve its program.
The consent of the artificial Knesset on the construction of 22 new colonies near the “Road 443” came in proceding with the extremist party of “religious Zionism” to ensure that he remains in the government coalition, while the Arab ministers are used as a tool to make Netanyahu sing himself.
This equation shows how all the regional interests are kidnapped to serve internal conflicts, while all hope is real progress towards the settlement.
Behind this complex scene, a fundamental dilemma is highlighted, that is to say that despite the American insistence on the payment of an initiative and a wink as a means of getting out of the crisis, the real objective goes beyond the safeguard of Gaza.
The administration tries to restrict Israeli law, which raises the slogan of “excessive force” in a unique way, but it does it without touching the structure of the system which nourishes this extremism.
Here, the fateful issue floats: can initiatives be woven in the political organs room create a lasting solution, or is it just a crisis recycling that will explode again with the first test?
Abortion of the Palestinian state by a conditional truce
In this context, the president of Jordan Society for Political Science D. Khaled Shinikat, that there is a consensus between visiting the occupation and the United States to disarm the only political disarmament belonging to the Palestinian resistance factions, which is the file of Israeli prisoners.
Shenikat explained that the proposals presented by the Israeli and American sides are limited to a temporary truce which extends for 60 days, accompanied by the introduction of humanitarian aid in limited conditions, without providing a forcing warranty a permanent cease-fire in the Gaza Strip.
He stressed that the plan pursued by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu focuses on the destruction of the Gaza Strip infrastructure, to make it a non -vital area, while strengthening the policy of travel.
Shinikat added that Israel categorically rejects any vision of establishing a Palestinian state, even if it is only a symbolic framework.
Shenikat has cited the statements of the Israeli Foreign Affairs, Yisrael Katz, in which he stressed that any Palestinian state will simply remain a theoretical idea, pointing plans to establish 22 new colonies in the West Bank in areas subjected to Palestinian authority, which reflects the intention of the Zionist entity to withdraw any attempt to establish a state of the Palestinians.
Shenikat explained that the American proposals made by the White House were indirectly repeated the same Israeli targets, while they seek to put pressure on the factions of Palestinian resistance through the developed negotiation strategy.
He added: “Initially, a negotiation document was presented, which included promises to end the war with American guarantees, but it was quickly retracted in favor of an Israeli article which reflects the requirements of Tel Aviv.”
He continued: “This document includes a temporary truce for a period of two months, conditional on the delivery of the prisoners first, without a clear warranty to withdraw Israeli forces or a commitment to the ceasefire after the end of the period.”
Shenikat stressed that this policy clearly reflects the Israeli vision which aims to reach the greatest number of gains without making fundamental concessions, which improves the continuation of the conflict and weakens the chances of achieving a fair political solution.
Formulate a political regulation
Consequently, the military and strategic analyst, Nidal Abu Zaid, explained that events of events at military and diplomatic levels reveal unhappy efforts to formulate a political settlement imposed on the Palestinian factions of the Gaza Strip.
Abu Zaid believes that the objective of this colony is to rid of Israel of the growing spoiler dilemma in a war that has reached a dead end, because it could not achieve its declared military objectives, which led the change of conflict to be a military confrontation to a tool to serve the political agenda of the right movement in Israel.
He stressed that the Palestinian factions, most likely, will not reject the currently advanced initiative, which has received Israeli approval, but their final decision may not be acceptable or a categorical rejection.
It is likely that the careful declaration of the situation aims to develop the elements of the initiative in its current form, with the inclusion of fundamental modifications which include the request for clear and restrictive American guarantees for each of its provisions.
Abu Zaid noted that the approval of the Knesset on the construction legislation of 22 new colony outposts along the road No. 443, reflects a political agreement held by the Prime Minister of Occupation, Benjamin Netanyahu, with the extremist Al -Yaqni Minister in Salail Smotrich.
Under this agreement, Smotrich receives wider powers in the West Bank’s file in exchange for his retirement from the threat to withdraw from the government coalition in the context of the admission to the initiative of ceasefire.
In the same context, according to Abu Zaid, the decision to prevent 5 Arab foreign ministers from visiting Ramallah as part of the negotiation and the pressure practiced by Smutic on Netanyahu.
He stressed that the first week of this month, which precedes the EID AL -Aha, can carry a diplomatic breakthrough for the conflict to Gaza, transferring it from the military field to the political track.
It seems that the American administration is determined to adopt the proposed initiative “can be an initiative and one or another” not necessarily for the benefit of Gaza, but rather in order to slow down the extremist Israeli and to prevent it from imposing its vision according to the principle of “which is not taken by force, is taken with more power”.
A war to improve the political project of the right
In turn, the political analyst specializing in Israeli affairs, Esmat Mansour, stressed that Netanyahu sees the pursuit of the war the opportunity to achieve his political objectives.
Mansour explained that Netanyahu seeks by extending the conflict to strengthen her political project in the West Bank and in Gaza Strip in order to marginalize the opposition and to preserve the cohesion of his power coalition.
“Netanyahu takes advantage of the war to maintain security priorities at the forefront of the interests of Israeli society, which distracts the attention of urgent internal questions such as corruption and economic crises.”
Mansour stressed that Netanyahu is based on security speech to strengthen her authority, using threats such as Hamas and resistance as an excuse to justify his policies.
However, this approach is faced with growing challenges, especially since some Arab countries seek to get out of this narrow path.
Mansour believes that Netanyahu can resort to target these countries or try to embarrass them, realizing that the strengthening of his authority contradicts any effort to weaken or divide the West Bank in preparation for the annexation.
Despite these challenges, he stressed that the path adopted by certain influential Arab countries in the region will face obstacles, but he can ultimately overcome them.
According to Mansour, this is due to the growing contrast of visions and priorities between the administration of the American president Donald Trump and Netanyahu, as well as the various hours.
Mansour stressed that Netanyahu gradually lost the most important pillars of his policy, which is American support, which can limit its ability to pursue this long -term approach.
