Politics

A new report of the work inspection excludes again that Nacho Cano’s companions have been employed

A second report on the inspection of work Has excludedas the first did, that the musical companions Malinche From Nacho cano They were workers And it does not appreciate the “irregularities”.

The relationship, which you had access EfeIt was sent on April 14 to the Court of Education number 19 of Madrid, whose head investigates on Nacho Cano and five other people for an alleged crime against the rights of workers and against the rights of foreign citizens.

The churches Immaculate Magistrates ordered the inspection of the work last February Emit a new report on the Mexican companions of the musical Malinche Since in the first it was not done “a complete research work”.

The first relationship He excluded that there would be evidence that the practices would imply “a hidden employment relationship” And it was concluded that the 17 Mexican scholars carried out non -working practices in the Malinche Musical Spain SL

Now the second report, prepared by a professional other than the first -when the judge requested -by the work done, completes it and concludes that “as in the first report (…) it was not possible to verify that the students in training were workers of the workers of Malinche the musicalOf Do not credit the typical notes of a working relationship: Personal work, willingness, compensation, dependence and alien (obtaining benefits from the entrepreneur) “.

No irregularities is appreciated As for the skills held by the inspection of work and social security, “he adds.

On the authorizations of the stay in Spain for the studies required by Mexican companions, the inspection specifies that, since they are not workers or companions included in the general law of social security, “control of their administrative situation in the field of foreigners does not compete with this inspection”.

In this report, of 20 folio, the performances of the subset that have made the first are defenses and it is necessary that the inspection of the work and the national police work together and that “the usual procedure (…) is always that the inspection qualifies the legal relationship and then the National Police acts accordingly”.

But in this case, the central police station of the capital requested a working undersplator for a performance on June 27, 2024, giving as “only information” that “the performance is urgent” since it was a matter of going to a seat of a musical that ended on June 30 “without the inspection had to know the previous investigation he had done”.

The report refers to the judge’s criticism on the first, including its author did not visit the work center or took into consideration the judicial actions in which they affirmed the previous police investigations and clarifies that the submarine was the place where the police took it, He interviewed all the dancers and said that “the appropriate would be to go and see the musical”But the agents told him “it was not possible”. He also requested numerous documents.

“Before the submarine issued the relationship, the police had already concluded that the relationship that joined the companions with the company was work,” he explains and underlines that this must determine the inspection. Nacho Cano was arrested on July 9, 2024, before the report was ready.

This second report describes in detail the interviews and documents collected in recent months to investigate the situation of Malinche Fellows and discarding that the typical requirements of a employment relationship will be given, underlining, for example, that “it was not possible to verify at all that the students have replaced at any time to the main actors of the musical” and therefore that the company has received fruits for it.

Nor has it been shown that the company has remunerated its companionsAlthough they gave them money to cover their personal expenses, some meals, accommodation or medical insurance.

Precisely this Wednesday the judge plans to make a declaration to three suspects in the case and two witnesses.

Source link

Related Articles

Back to top button