The defense requires further evidence and the accusation asks that the oral process be celebrated
The particular accusation In the case of Esther LópezThe Stroke Girl (Valladolid) who appeared dead in a gutter on February 5, 2022 after 23 missing days, requested the opening of the process Oral against the only investigation, óscar sm his defense, in the meantime, has announced it You will ask for further tests.
This was transferred from their respective lawyers to journalists after the opinion in which They declared 11 civil guards and four volunteers who participated in Esther’s search tasks, including what the body found.
The family lawyer, Guillermo Ruiz Blay, said that at this moment the case is at the same point, with “all the test practiced”. Influenced it “With three years of research it is already enough“, Therefore the procedure” must walk towards the process. “
For their part, the lawyers of Oscar SM, Ana Pérez and Loreto Sánchez, reiterated it The body has been transferred For someone to the gutter where it appeared and, therefore, “it was not always (25 days) where it was found”. “We are missing any test that we will request,” said Sánchez, who opened him with these testimonies “There is no new term or news”, but “I am The first testimony which are practiced in three long years in the Court of Education, which surprises even more because it is at the request of the defense. “
In this regard, Ruiz Blay stressed that the defense will keep the line to request further evidence, although in his opinion “the logic” is that the judge refuses them since then “Education is closed And if there is something to lift, they will have to do it in the trial. “
Back to the beats
The statements of the fifteen witnesses have focused on Monitoring activities of sectors 2 and 3 of struggle in those winter days. While the family lawyer transferred the position of the agents according to which “the search for a body is complex” and that aspects like the color of clothes, weeds or distance significantly damage the research, the defense showed its surprise that “neither on the ground, nor with dogs, nor with motorcycles, nor the research personnel has seen absolutely nothing”.
Oscar SM lawyers concluded that the body would be transported by someone, but they indicated that not from their client, since then It was “inspected and kept” And he collaborated “absolutely in everything”, always according to his version.
I also disagree with the testimony of a person in the area who assured him Past several times through the place in which the body was subsequently found and saw nothing. This forced the accusation, according to Ruiz Blay himself, to warn her that it could “be incorrect in false testimony“When you perform events that did not coincide with the objective test.
