The prosecutor’s office coincides with the judge and asks to present the cause of sexual aggressions against Juan José Ballesta
The prosecutor’s office asked the provincial court of Madrid to archive the cause that followed against the actor Juan José Ballesta For an alleged sexual aggression a have “more than reasonable doubts” On the history of the complaint, which undergoes a mental disorder and has given contradictory versions.
This is indicated in a letter, which has had access Efein which the prosecutor’s office shows its compliance with the order of conclusion of the summary without elaboration dictated by the didactic judge e Ask the archive of the cause open to the law and an acquaintance of his.
Last March the head of the Court of Education Number 4 of speak decreed the conclusion of the procedure without processing For the two suspects not seeing evidence that incriminate. And now it is the provincial court that must decide whether to present the case.
The procedure began after Complaint that presented a 47 years since 2023 Against the actor – who became known in the year 2000 with his interpretation in the film “El Bola” and against another man for two violations suffered in July, after which the woman entered a psychiatric center with a psychotic outbreak.
This is a woman who has a diagnosed disease And at that moment he did not take the drug, as investigated.
Ballesta (Madrid, 1987) declared, after having known the conclusion of the procedure without elaboration, that I was very satisfied after a year and a half “very hard” in which many work doors were closed. And he trusted the final file of the process.
The prosecutor’s office, according to the judge
Now The prosecutor’s office communicates to the Provincial Court that The judge’s decision is Instructor and interests the provisional dismissal of the actions “by understanding that the perpetration of the illicit fact was not credited by the test”.
The detailed prosecutor that the denunciant suffers from paranoid schizophrenia and may have perceived “facts not warm in time and space with the actually that occurred”, due to the consumption of a narcotic substance since he did not take his drugs.
Specifies that this possible “distortion of facts” It is not due to the “conscious falsehood”But it can be the result of a delirium that is frequent in this type of schizophrenic condition. The public prosecutor recalls that the woman offered “different and/or non -toval versions”, inconsistently.
“Given the contradictory versions offered by the complaint, the contradiction that must be renowned internally and insurmountable, without the need for greater evidence of the content of the declarations of two suspects two (…), it must be considered that the probability of the narrative offered generates more than reasonable doubts about the total credibility of what happened“He concludes.
From the Ospina Abogados office, who defends Juan José Ballesta, have expressed their satisfaction for this decision of the Prosecutor.
The lawyer Beatriz Uriarte detailed the fact that the fact that the prosecutor’s office “is shown in accordance with the topics presented by the defense shows that we are aimed in search of truth” and trusted the archive of the procedure, although it has specified that it is necessary to be “very prudent” and respect the procedural deadline.
