Discussing the financial operations tax (IOF) has again put the government against economists. Using an organizational honor to try to balance the public accounts, the executive authority showed that it was not willing to deal with the economy, according to the experts who heard before CNN.
“This question is the aroma of improvisation because it is improvisation. AmateursPeople are not prepared, without knowing the Brazilian economy, “the former director of the Central Bank (BC) Alexander Shorestan.
“Saying that there is no money to pay the price of the device after the spending increased by $ 220 billion is an insight into the intelligence of the Brazilian public. It seems as if the child has arrived:“ Dad, I spent everything I have, I need you to give me more. “Your friend, if you spend your entirely, your problem is for you, not mine.
He sees Sérgio Machado, Mag Investimentos, The government is away from the interests of growth and development of the Brazilian economy To expand the group. In addition, it doubts the real efficiency to support public accounts.
“This honor simply ends the industry and will not be born real from capture. (For example), because no one will pay 5 % to make the pension box. This is the worst medications, it is a cm. It kills patients and does not solve anything.”
The last day 22, The government announced the rise of IOF For a series of exchanges, private pensions and corporate credit. The expectation of the economic team is to raise $ 20 billion in 2025 and 41 billion dollars in 2026 with this measure.
On the same day, The Executive Authority has announced the freezing of $ 31.3 billion spendingThe largest management of Lula. However, estimate the end of the year is that the basic deficit is close to tolerance with 025 % of total local products (gross domestic product) – equivalent to $ 31 billion.
The current scenario is a reflection of how the government addresses public accounts from the beginningAccording to Tony Volbon, the former director of the Central Bank (BC) and column writer Cnn money.
“Dynamics begin as the growth of these mandatory expenses exceeds the growth of the recipe. We repeat the same dynamics, and it appears to be the way of Petista to adhere to the financial policy,” he says.
If the government does not bear the responsibility for coordinating the financial amendment, the expectations of Marcus Lesboa, the former president of INSper and the former minister of economic policy at the Ministry of Finance in the Lula 1 government, Brazil moves to a “serious economic crisis such as those that occurred in 2015”.
Political wearing
Not only is not economical, but also political, according to the experts who have heard before CNN.
“The government does not seem to have understood that Congress today is the protagonist of public policies in the countryLucas Aragau, CEO of ARKO Excloy says.
Former Prime Minister of the Treasury and the President of the Kid Economy in the Pavilion, Jefferson Betinkurt, The government has chosen IOF lifting is one of the symptoms of wearing with Congress.
“The best output (for IOF) is to find permanent revenues to replace the decree. IOF (to close accounts) is an indication of the government’s perception that he cannot spend anything else in Congress.”
