A major animal rights issue in the housing community has arisen in the lower Baril. 51 -The businessman Ashish Guyal arrived at the Bombay High Court with his blind pet dog. Their complaint is that the Administrative Committee in the “Marathon Marathon” community has banned AZI to take three organs for organs only, which is an open violation of animal rights. Joyl raised Pil through his lawyer, her master Fidia and begged to justice.
What is the problem?
Joyl lives on the twenty-second floor in the ERA-2 Tower of the Cooperative Housing Association “ERA-2” at Ganpat Rao Kadam Marg in Lower Parel. This four society has a total of 229 apartments, and six existing elevators. Among them, the elevator No. 1, 2 and 3 for members, tenants and guests are reserved. While elevators 4, 5 and 6 were described for local assistants and employees.
Azzi’s story: a struggle full of struggle
Azzi is a Diviang dog (blind), born four years ago on Debuly. Because he was blind from birth, he could not even drink milk from his mother and as soon as he fell into a nearby pool. A good person saved him. When Joyal got acquainted with the position of the Azeri, it immediately built it.
Stop and opposition to lift
On January 14, 2024, a member of the community arrested Joyl and said he could not take an Azi only to raise the members because it violates the rules of society. After this incident, Joyl filed a complaint against a member of an inactive crime.
Joyl says that on the same night that the aforementioned member published in the WhatsApp 260 group, it is prohibited to take pets in some elevators. Aside from this, it was claimed that Joyal resorted to the police after breaking the rules of society, because of his criticism of other members of society as well.
Changes in legal rules and questions
On February 24, Joyl filed a complaint with the police stating that an anti -pets are being created in society. He also said that the “pet policy” by the association that was implemented on February 25 was created after the January 14 incident, meaning that it was deliberately made so that it could be condemned.
Joyl said in a petition submitted in the Bombay High Court that this new policy and punishment issued by society are in violation of the guidelines issued by the Animal Welfare Council during the era of the government of India. It also violates the law of the Maharashtra Cooperative Association.
Now we hope for the judiciary
This situation is not limited to entering a pet, but it can become an example of animal rights in the country and the borders of community management forces. Only after listening to the Supreme Court, it will be determined if AZI will get the right to live with the same honor with its owner as another member.
