On Tuesday (29), the Constitution and Justice Committee in the Chamber (CCJ) rejected (29), with 44 votes to 22, the appeal submitted by the deputy Glauber Braga (PSOL-RJ) against a decision The process of canceling your mandate in the Ethics Council.
With rejection, the process will continue to analyze the plenary session, as it should be in place within 60 days, according to House of Representatives, Hugo Motta (Republicans-PB). In order to approve the cracking, at least 257 votes are required.
In CCJ, most of the committee accompanied The decision in the committee, Alex Manant (Citizenship), who voted for his opinion to deny the appeal. The report analysis session lasted about 7 hours.
Manti argued in the opinion that Glir’s defense allegations dealt with merit, not procedures. In his report, he stated that the matter is not returning to CCJ to discuss the measurement of doses and suit the punishment with the deputy. According to The Rapporteur, the committee must analyze whether there is respect for the constitutionality and procedural in the Ethics Council.
In the appeal, Glipper stated at the meeting that he will travel through the states of the Union for 60 days and provide his defense of maintaining his mandate.
“I will pass through 26 Brazilian countries to offer defensive, and I follow people about what is happening. I make myself available to present the arguments to any of the parliamentarians who want to hear me,” he said.
If the operation is applied and approved to sit, Glauber may lose its mandate and it may be unqualified for eight years. He is in his fourth term, followed by the deputy Rio de Janeiro. Earlier, the place was first taken in 2009 as a substitute.
Defense requests
In the session, Andrei Mimoni’s lawyer, GLABER, said that there was an unpaid for the proposed penalty, with the loss of the mandate. “The CCJ in the House of Representatives does not need to go to the facts, and it is not necessary to go to the procedures of the operation to see that it is a penalty that is not proportional. You do not need to go to any tool other than the Brazilian federal constitution.”
The procedures were presented to the GLABER Ethics Council by the new party. Glauber is Accused of paying and expelling a member of the Free Brazil movement (MBL) from the National Congress During confusion in 2024, when Parliament kicks the man.
At that time, Glir said he heard crimes against his mother, who motivated his reaction. On Tuesday, he highlighted that it was a target of provocations by a MBL member for “Seven times”. It was the fifth time in the episode that occurred in Congress.
The appeal submitted by the Globeer defense interrogated several points of the case in the council, such as: the authenticity of the original procedure; Doubts are decided, PSD-BA; PSD-BA; A possible crime of internal standards; The supposed absence of proportionality in the imposed punishment; Reducing the alleged defense; The alleged violation of falling on previous issues.
The request also claimed that Glauber acted with self -defense and stated that there was “political persecution of the deviation of the goal” against Parliament. The document also confirmed that the actions of the deputy will be protected by parliamentary immunity.
Hunger
Before the CCJ analysis, it was Glauber Braga More than a week since hunger is a hunger as a protest against the cracking process. The movement was protesting the decision of the Ethics Council in the House of Representatives, which agreed to an opinion in favor of canceling its mandate.
The strike ended after negotiating with the mayor. Under the agreement, Hugo Motta pledged to give 60 days after CCJ decision, before directing the procedure against Glauber in Al -Jallal.
