Country news cannot become a relationship formed by approval as a basis for starting a criminal process: court

New Delhi, May 26, said in the Supreme Court on Monday that the acidity constituted by approval or distance between the spouses could not be the basis for the start of a criminal process and “it is not only burning on the courts, but also the confusion of supporting the accused.”

The Supreme Court presented this comment in July 2023, and rejected the criminal case registered against a person in the state of Maharashtra. The person was accused of raping a woman through a promising marriage.

A group of justice BV nagartna and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma said that although allegations in the aviation information area are not correct, the record does not seem that the approval of the complainant has been taken against his will and only with the promise of marriage.

The seat said, “In our opinion, it is not a condition in which the wrong promise of marriage is initially.” There can be no acidity in the relationship of approval or distance between the partners, and the start of a criminal process. ” ”

The court said: “This type of behavior does not only put a burden on the courts, but also roams the person accused of such heinous crime.”

The seat said that the Supreme Court has repeatedly warned of the abuse of the rulings and said that it was “random” to prosecute a person in the crime of rape, taking into account every violation of the promise of marriage as a false promise.

The Abix court issued its ruling on the appeal submitted by the accused, challenging the Pombay Supreme Court order in June 2024. The Supreme Court rejected his call to cancel the case against him due to alleged crimes, including rape in Satara.

The court said that the case was registered on the woman’s complaint, which claimed that during June 2022 to July 2023, the accused and the strength of a false marriage promise had a false marriage.

However, the accused denied these allegations.

The seat said that after registering the aviation information area, the accused approached the minimum pre -emptive bail, which was approved in August 2023.

The court said that the accused and the source of the complaint were aware of each other since June 2022 and admitted that they often interact and fell in love.

The bench said: “It is not worth believing that the complainant promised a physical relationship with the appellant (the accused), while the woman was already married to another person.”

The Apox Court accepted the appeal and threw the Supreme Court order.

The seat said: “Taking into account that the age of the appellant is only 25 years old, it will be in the interest of justice that he does not face a neighboring trial, and thus the procedures are canceled.”

(This is a unified story and automatically created from feeding joint news. There is a possibility that there is no change or editing by the latest employees)