Carlo Ancelotti’s defense believes that Real Madrid coach had to sit in the morning on the bench from the defendants if the club had organized in an Orthodox manner payments to the technical in his first stage, from 2013 to 2015, closed the trial due to the alleged fraud for four years and nine months in prison.
Ancelotti and his defense in the trial maintained that the technician was in this procedural situation to reach the club’s facilitation to provide part of the necessary taxes until he obtained a net six million euros in every season he agreed to. The club suggested distributing it in two types of payment: 85 % salary and 15 % as image rightsWhich requires less than keeping. The Italian agreed, and for the operation, English language consultants have established a network of companies based in the British Virgin Financial Paradise. The journey that led to the court seat began. Zabala said, “I was badly told,” Zabala said. “Contracts are authentic desserts.”
Tax Agency, with A small profession in the persecution of these armed structures by football playersHe understood that he was “a work to enter the channel and not pay in Spain,” according to an accusation expert. For Zabala, on the other hand, the Temple did not seek to benefit from Ancelotti, but for the club: “He hid a more comfortable tax for Real Madrid.” He made it clear to the lawyer and economist Manuel de Vicente Tokur, who announced as a defense expert. “Taxes on behalf of the club,” he said. “If the taxes decrease, the total total.” The cost that Ancelotti received was six million networks less if part of the image rights was paid.
Zabala said that the mechanism saved the club 276,000 euros, which was the additional blocking that would have paid the public treasury if 100 % of the six would be a pure salary. “If Real Madrid pays 276,000 euros, we will not be here,” he insisted. In this case, fraud quantities will not reach 120,000 euros annually, the threshold that must be taken into account, so it was not possible to be treated through criminal procedures.
Ancelotti’s lawyer reprimanded the accusations that he did not walk on an administrative road. “Let’s see if you eventually left the money with fear of going to prison,” he concluded, a wide sense of players who fell in front of the coach under the enlarged glass of this same group of inspectors. They also asked about the lack of direction of the operation against Madrid, which the accused experts referred to the “collusion” in the alleged fraud. Zabala recalled that the Supreme Court condemned Rayo Vallecano in 2020 for not making his players withhold, who says Madrid did so. “No football player has been subjected to. Here is a change in standards and only the coach faces.” The accusation maintained his difference with this interpretation: It was Ancelotti who tried to avoid paying taxes. The three judges will fail in the coming weeks.
