after Jose Manuel Rodriguez OreibsCSD president said in an interview that Danny Olmo is playing for a mistake in Laliga and Al -Ittihad, Javier Tebas A wide letter in X.
This was the full message of the President of La Liga.
CSD, publicly indicated that the responsibility is in the case of Danny Olmo from Laliga, because it raised the matter in a monitoring committee without competencies. Looking at this statement, it is possible to ask a simple question:
Who then released the new license for players Danny Olmo and Bau Vetar?
CSD decision itself failed to create any exploratory history, and given this absence, it concludes that the previous licenses have not been canceled.
It is difficult to preserve this argument, for several reasons:
The licenses were explicitly issued until December 31, 2024, the date was agreed upon and signed by the club and the players.
This date was not symbolic: FC Barcelona itself went to the normal judicial jurisdiction that requests urgent precautionary measures before the end of the year, claiming that the licenses ended on December 31.
– This request was rejected, but it clearly reveals that the club assumed that, as of January 1, the players were not desirable.
From there, the CSD thesis “there was no explicit cancellation”, and therefore, the license remained in effect, means re -explaining a clear documentary fact: the contractual and organizational authority signed until December 31.
And all this to conclude that the problem was … after I transferred the matter to an insufficient commission.
With all institutional respect, we believe that the legal fund cannot be reduced to official discussion discussions. The relevant thing is when and how a new license has been treated (or not), and if administrative mechanisms are used in a way that is consistent with their own actions of the parties concerned.
Sometimes, in an attempt to convert the focus, it is that the administrative law also requires consistency, motivation and legal certainty.
