Gurugram: a young couple who was refused by the son who are still waiting for help

Gurugram, June 1: HHRC’s Human Rights Committee has instructed the Gurugram administration to consider the case of the elderly couple that the son rejected in the Ridgewood Estate buildings, yet no officer or community officials has yet contacted it. The population there gave this information on Sunday. He claimed that the elderly spouses left the couple and lived abroad. The 96 -year -old elderly man while his wife was 86 years old. The residents of the Amara community said that the spouses still live in a very bad situation, and no one comes to meet them and the officials have not taken any action. One of the Hawza residents said he heard the loud voices of the elderly couple, day and night. He said that no one comes to see them and their condition is not good. His son has not yet contacted him. Another resident said: “I did not see his son coming.” A woman used to come, but she stopped coming in the past few months. The boycott administration should take immediate measures to help the couple. ” ”

Kito Makhur, Secretary of the Redgo Real Estate Buildings Association, said that the couple has been living in this society since 2001, but there is no information, including their name. Mathur said that he did not attend any community program, and the son regularly paid the apartment maintenance fees online. He said that the association does not have information about its location, except for its phone number and the email identifier, which is available in community records.

Macher said: “We are grateful to Judge HHRC Lalit Batra, who expressed concern about the long mental and physical suffering facing the couple, but no action has been taken by the boycott administration yet,” Macher said. Based on a complaint from the community, HHRC instructed to the boycott administration and the health of officials in the immediate, psychological and social medical evaluation of the couple. Also read: Jamo and Kashmir: 149 drug and livestock smugglers that were arrested in Udhambur within five months

The complaint claimed that the elderly had been abandoned in a state of serious neglect, and they should rely on two non -trained hosts without appropriate medical care. Judge Patra took the complaint that the elderly person often heard of pain and crying, causing a serious emotional shock not only for his wife but also the elderly around him. The Chairman of the HHRC, Judge Lalit Patra, expressed his deep concern about the mental and physical suffering by Dabante for a long time and described it as a violation of the basic right to live with respect stated under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Judge Patra emphasized the provisions of parents and the elderly, especially Article 20, especially Article 20, which links the state to providing adequate health services to citizens, including the beds of the seized hospitals, separate existing lists and reduced treatment. The committee said that if it is proven that the spouses were deliberately released, the son may have to face criminal obligations under Article 24 of the law. The committee directed the Deputy Commissioner of Gurugram to form a multidisciplinary committee, including the police commissioner, sub -judge, civil surgeon, and boycott social welfare employee to evaluate the status of the couple and prepare a long -term care plan. The committee asked the next session to submit the report before July 3, 2025. Despite the repeated efforts, the deputy delegate of Gurugram Ajay Kumar cannot be contacted.