EFormer football player Danny Alves Es libre It has been announced Innocent. he It was acquitted by the Supreme Court of Justice in Catalonia After canceling a condemnation Four and a half years from Crcel Which imposed Barcelona fans on Violation of a young woman in Disco Soton In December 2022.
In its punishment, the Civil and Criminal Chamber of TSJC unanimously appreciates the appeal submitted by the defense of the former player in Barcelona and they get it with sexual aggression, taking into account that Tests are practiced In the trial they do not allow “Overcoming the criteria required by assuming innocence.”
Alves was in the preventive prison for fourteen months And he came out in L.Ibertad temporary in March last yearAfter depositing On bail of one million eurosOnce the Barcelona fans condemned the crime of sexual assault.
“We are very happy”
After the ability, the Brazilian lawyer, In GuardiolaThe news celebrated:Finally, justice has been made“.
“I am with Danny Alves. We are very happy. It is innocent. It has been proven. Justice has already spokenHe said in an interview in Rac1.
The lawyer realized this She and Danny Alves expected innocence. Guardiola confirmed that it was not possible to read the “wide” sentence and know that it is not firm. When I was asked if you are planning to request compensation, I have expressed that they could not say that.
TSJC unanimously canceled the sentence to alves
The Appeal Department of the Supreme Court of Justice in Catalonia Consensus he attractiveness From Danny Alves was that Condemn For Article 21 of the Barcelona Provincial Court to 4 years and 6 months of prison due to the crime of sexual assault against a young woman.
The plenary session of the Appeals Department, consisting of Judges Maria Xels Vivas (President), Roser Bach and Marz Jesus Manzano and Judge Manuel XVarezfor Not “The status court is expressed in its decision, the exhibition that contains it during logic A series of emptiness, inaccuracy, contradictions and contradictions on facts, and its consequences. ”
The decision considers that the specified sentence provides valuable parties that prevent the participation of “the evaluation of the case court or the conclusion that arrives.” This is what “From the practicing test, we cannot conclude that the criteria that require the assumption of innocence have been overcomeAnd remember that Administrative sentences require “the law of enhanced motivation”.
The court is that the fact that the irritation does not provide the accusation does not assert “The real inflation is what maintains the defendant’s defense.”
