The regional Salmanca Court acquitted a young man by wearing a crime of sexual aggression. The victim, who has not remembered anything since three in the morning from the day when the events occurred, denounced the donation after they learned that they had sex and did not remember anything. They were colleagues from the institute and imposed on him previously. However, on that night, as the sentence was dictated, they have sex without a condom.
The day after this event, the young man sent several messages in a “affectionate” tone to his partner, and at that time he began to rebuild a night who did not remember anything. He admits that he drank the same on other occasions and that he had never happened to him not to remember the night part.
He concluded that he was not spoiled, and at the same time he went to the hospital with his mother, where he was attacked. The male was prevented. He received a psychological treatment.
Among the other details, in the sentence, they are moments that support a clear young drunk state, who could not open the door of her house upon her arrival, emancipated in the bathroom and had to put her pajamas and go to bed for a friend of her -do not charge sexual assault. In addition, in some of the pictures displayed near the young woman’s floor, you can see how a friend takes someone to someone, expected to a young woman.
The next day, in the WhatsApp group of her colleagues, a video was sent as she realized that she did not know that two of her teammates were doing in her room.
An advertisement for a classmate
One of the people who witnessed a friend of both parties was acknowledged that at that time I was a friend of the young man. However, after the events that occurred, he had no contact with the male again and remains as a friend of the victim.
In addition, another of the victim’s friends in her testimony indicates that “from the beginning her friend said that she does not want to have sex with the defendant and that she gave her her rejection equally.”
Witnesses
The sentence determines that there is no laughter of the victim’s testimony in the opinion of the witnesses. “None of the witnesses stated that it was clearly seen that Vegoña was not aware and did not know what he was doing.”
Patent
The defendant says, “It was the one who led to everything.” According to the young man, he gave him something because he knows he has a friend, after several attempts to keep a relationship. He also hurried to him that his friend was the next. However, she had sex with her, not a preservative, but she did not come to ejaculation.
The victim did not prove sex
According to the regional test, the victim did not prove that he refused to preserve sexual relations, claiming some ability to identify self according to the context in which the report is reported.
“From the perspective of the neutral observer, it can be considered reasonable for the belief that the defendant cannot clearly imagine the absence of the consent of the young woman (because of his inability and which is the context in the context, given the context, given the context that there is a context in which sexual relations were produced,” dictates the sentence.
