The constitutional protects the mother who denounced the sexual violence and fled with her son
Before starting the separation process, a woman moved with her three -son -Amad to the city where her parents live (grandparents … Mother’s child). There, 600 km away, OVR filed a complaint about the gender violence against what his partner and father were to the child. I remained in La Coruña and He, JVO, at Vitoria-JASTEIIIIII, where it was the common matter. After nine months of escaping, in July 2021, the Court of Trainers issued before the divorce, which gave the mother’s guard and a nursery, but on condition that he practiced in the city of Basque, where the child’s father lived.
With the registration of the “registered and pressure in La Coruña, where the mother and son enjoyed a more stable and safe social and family environment,” according to the recent ruling issued by the Constitutional Court, OVR appealed that the decision of the violence court on women 1 of Vitoria-CASTEIZ, claiming that he does not know the requests for its protection measures. In addition, he claimed that he restricted “without legal support his freedoms from circulation and residence” and affected “the best interests of the minor”, by exposing violence.
“A duty to be preached to the gender violence contexts,” Constitutional affirms, in a decision issued on Friday. “Commitment to prevention and protection against the violence of the sons and daughters of women is victims of sexual violence,” without the benefits of the minor to return to the father of the father.
With this criterion, the second chamber of the constitution recognizes the placing of the victim of the gender violence of the mother, which was supported by social services in Coruña, and protects it so that it does not return to live as the previous ruling resides, as required from the previous sentence. Thus, the judges, a “recycling”, would have occurred “the fear that sexual violence raises their victims when they entered and made decisions regarding children and joint girls,” according to the spokeswoman Maria Louisa with wages.
both
The decision, however, is not unanimous. She has a special vote from Enrique Arnaldo Alcubella and Sisar Tolosa Tribiano, who appreciate “violating the right to assuming without a patent Don Givo” that had been martyred, with an “absolute sentence” of sexual aggression.
In addition, the judges guarantee that “ACRISOLATE’s constitutional doctrine on evidence” has been modified, increased complaint and crowded with evidence.
