The controversy in the literary world: The writer condemns the “hate women and the Mixo” (and the interaction of the famous “in the bloc”)
The controversy has been installed. Madalana Sana FernandezA recognized newspaper and historian generalAccuse Joao Pedro George to “Women hate and machines “On social networks. At stake, the latest comments made by the sociologist and literary critic of the Portuguese.
Everything happened during the last episode of Podcast Literary Al -Khamasi: Talks in Leverrri MartinsIt is available on YouTube since February of this year, 2025.
In a conversation with the coordination driver, Miguel sizymanskiAnd with the writer Anna BarbaraJoao Pedro George analyzed the book that was presented by Madalana Sana Fernandez In the literary world, RudderWhich tells the story of a toxic relationship. It was from here that things did not go well.
Was this later analyzed the way the author knew its new work, DriftingIn the eyes of Madalana Sana Fernandez, the writer was, at the time, a “A sad man.” The complaint was submitted on your Instagram account by sharing an extract of the video, on Monday, March 24.
“Listen because they will learn that there is a face of domestic violence. It is just another sad man bothered me because I smiled. Because I have photographs or flowers with flowers (?). Sad man “I started writing in the registration naming.
“I will never reject literary criticism. However, but Here is to criticize Instagram photos, personal life and exceptional criticism of the smile of suffering. Physical analysis and seek opinions. Then they ask why women insist on writing what they live in. This is because there is still a long way. This is because there are still people like you.Drawing is often less clear. Here we have women’s hatred and Machismo without the slightest shame. Sad men and women overlook. Shy “and Madalana continued Sana Fernandez, not only left recognition, but also a promise.
“I think I told my friend to keep a company, it is unfortunate to see it alone at the book fair. I will continue to write about what I want. and I do not give up my smile. I did not give in to all the violence that I suffered from; I will not give up to sad and unitary men.I seek a lot in my work, but I am a woman.Save, how you can check below.
The truth is that the writer’s participation gained importance and led to many known voices from the Portuguese audience – from many areas – if they ride on their side in the comments.
“The poor … was wrong, I think he was on Taska with his friends … ah! And I think we were in 1950.These are Julia Balha.
“Benjo made the outdated male card. Always doubt about merit, to say that it must be cunha, ask the head of the victims and its low head, all so that they do not deal with the talent of a successful woman. Chlixes say a lot of yourself and nothing from those who criticize “Modified Capicua.
“I would like to say that this is the literary version of taxi drivers “wearing clothes this way and then fans”, but there are no versions here. In essence, the taxi driver and this man They are the sameBecause it does not matter anything that reads more books than the other.Criticize Nuno Mark.
“Isn’t this artificial intelligence (artificial intelligence)? It is very bad to be true. “and “What a shame. I do not believe.” E “How sad, re -boxes, envious and stealing weapons”They said Inês Ires Pereiraand Rita Patosinho E Iva dominguesrespectively.
NThis was my intention” Joao Pedro George has already spoke
Looking at the controversy, Joao Pedro George saw himself “thank you” for pronouncing. In the participation of Madalena Sá Fernandes, the sociologist left a comment and spoke at a “misunderstanding”.
“Given the misunderstanding resulting from some of my statements after a comment on the marketing of the book.DriftingWritten by the writer Madalana Sana Fernandez, I wanted to clarify the following: I realized that the indication of the appearance of women has a long history in patriarchal and chauvinist culture and that calling this element in a wrong and unhappy public conversation.I started writing.
“I apologize for this association of ideas, but this was not my intention. At any time I intended to create a relationship between the quality of work and promote it on social networks. It was always aimed at literature as a social phenomenon and as a source of social analysis. In this sense, the evaluation of the semiotics of authors and authors – without gender discrimination -, within the scope of the editorial environment, is an exercise that I was practicing, in a comfortable and ballistic way. I admit that my critical freedom, sometimes satirical, can create discomfort and remorse on the characteristic of the adjective to the way the author issued the book It was discussed in the “Five Literary” programSave.
